+24.8%
GLDM vs PEGA
-30.0%
+54.9%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PEGA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.0% | +0.1% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +3.3% | -3.8% | -0.5% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +17.7% | -13.3% | +4.6% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +5.8% | -6.9% | -0.9% |
| 6M | -13.7% | -20.3% | +6.6% | -14.1% |
| YTD | +2.8% | -37.1% | +39.9% | +2.8% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | -30.2% | +55.0% | +25.3% |
| All | +24.8% | -30.0% | +54.9% | +25.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PEGA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PEGA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PEGA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PEGA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling