+24.8%
GLDM vs NTR
+43.1%
-18.2%
-26.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -1.6% | +0.7% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -0.5% | +8.1% | -8.6% | -1.8% |
| 30D | +4.4% | +18.8% | -14.4% | +1.5% |
| 3M | -1.1% | +16.2% | -17.3% | -3.6% |
| 6M | -13.7% | +9.8% | -23.4% | -15.8% |
| YTD | +2.8% | +30.9% | -28.1% | -2.0% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | +41.8% | -16.9% | +18.5% |
| All | +24.8% | +43.1% | -18.2% | +18.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling