+3.1%
GLDM vs ARWR
+59.7%
-56.6%
-28.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARWR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | +3.6% | +0.1% | +3.4% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +2.4% | -2.7% | -0.5% |
| 30D | -1.9% | -1.1% | -0.7% | -1.8% |
| 3M | -0.4% | -31.2% | +30.8% | +2.4% |
| 6M | -10.1% | -19.3% | +9.2% | -8.9% |
| YTD | -5.8% | -7.1% | +1.3% | -5.9% |
| 1Y | +3.1% | +62.9% | -59.8% | +1.9% |
| All | +3.1% | +59.7% | -56.6% | +1.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARWR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARWR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARWR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARWR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling