+2.8%
GLD vs ZETA
+84.8%
-82.0%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | +2.6% | +1.1% | +3.5% |
| 7D | -0.3% | -5.0% | +4.7% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -1.9% | -3.3% | +1.5% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -0.4% | +31.0% | -31.4% | -2.6% |
| 6M | -10.2% | +72.2% | -82.3% | -13.7% |
| YTD | -6.0% | +56.2% | -62.2% | -9.2% |
| 1Y | +2.8% | +90.3% | -87.5% | -2.3% |
| All | +2.8% | +84.8% | -82.0% | -2.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling