+24.5%
GLD vs FLNC
+53.3%
-28.8%
-26.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | +1.5% | -2.3% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -4.9% | +4.4% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +4.4% | -27.3% | +31.7% | +6.0% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -61.9% | +60.8% | +3.2% |
| 6M | -13.8% | -34.5% | +20.7% | -13.2% |
| YTD | +2.6% | -47.7% | +50.3% | +4.6% |
| 1Y | +24.5% | +53.3% | -28.8% | +23.3% |
| All | +24.5% | +53.3% | -28.8% | +23.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling