+45.4%
GILD vs NIO
-54.1%
+99.5%
-21.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | +3.4% | +0.7% | +4.0% |
| 7D | +9.6% | -0.6% | +10.2% | +9.6% |
| 30D | +20.6% | -3.5% | +24.1% | +20.8% |
| 3M | +29.7% | -30.7% | +60.4% | +31.6% |
| 6M | +33.1% | -45.6% | +78.7% | +36.8% |
| YTD | +44.7% | -35.3% | +80.0% | +44.8% |
| 1Y | +45.4% | -53.9% | +99.3% | +51.3% |
| All | +45.4% | -54.1% | +99.5% | +51.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling