+71.8%
GH vs FLNC
-69.0%
+140.7%
-33.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.7% | +10.2% | -13.9% | -4.4% |
| 7D | -7.7% | -2.1% | -5.6% | -7.6% |
| 30D | -10.0% | -20.8% | +10.8% | -8.8% |
| 3M | +5.5% | -61.3% | +66.8% | +11.9% |
| 6M | +84.9% | -50.9% | +135.8% | +87.4% |
| YTD | +65.0% | -69.4% | +134.4% | +77.1% |
| 1Y | +71.8% | -68.4% | +140.2% | +83.3% |
| All | +71.8% | -69.0% | +140.7% | +83.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling