+54.8%
GDX vs XLC
0.0%
+54.9%
-38.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.2% | -1.2% | -1.0% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -0.4% | -0.8% | +0.5% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +18.6% | +1.0% | +17.6% | +17.9% |
| 3M | +14.9% | -0.7% | +15.6% | +16.4% |
| 6M | -6.3% | -5.1% | -1.1% | -3.4% |
| YTD | +15.7% | -4.3% | +20.0% | +18.8% |
| 1Y | +54.8% | -0.6% | +55.4% | +52.5% |
| All | +54.8% | 0.0% | +54.9% | +52.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling