+24.8%
GDX vs NIO
-54.1%
+78.9%
-38.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.0% | +3.4% | +5.6% | +8.4% |
| 7D | +0.8% | -0.6% | +1.4% | +0.9% |
| 30D | -3.2% | -3.5% | +0.3% | -2.7% |
| 3M | +8.6% | -30.7% | +39.2% | +14.6% |
| 6M | -1.2% | -45.6% | +44.4% | +8.3% |
| YTD | -1.4% | -35.3% | +33.9% | +6.9% |
| 1Y | +24.8% | -53.9% | +78.7% | +63.9% |
| All | +24.8% | -54.1% | +78.9% | +63.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling