+8.2%
GD vs UMAC
+2.9%
+5.2%
-17.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.6% | -10.9% | +8.3% | -2.2% |
| 7D | +3.0% | -26.0% | +29.0% | +4.0% |
| 30D | +10.5% | -40.3% | +50.8% | +12.5% |
| 3M | -5.0% | -51.1% | +46.2% | -2.8% |
| 6M | +5.5% | -5.6% | +11.1% | +3.3% |
| YTD | +10.3% | +2.3% | +8.1% | +5.0% |
| 1Y | +8.2% | +7.9% | +0.3% | +2.2% |
| All | +8.2% | +2.9% | +5.2% | +2.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling