+104.5%
FTNT vs ZTS
-49.3%
+153.8%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.6% | +0.6% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -5.8% | -2.0% | -3.9% | -6.4% |
| 30D | -4.8% | +1.9% | -6.7% | -4.1% |
| 3M | +4.4% | -4.0% | +8.4% | +3.5% |
| 6M | +88.8% | -39.1% | +127.9% | +71.9% |
| YTD | +96.8% | -38.8% | +135.6% | +79.1% |
| 1Y | +104.5% | -49.6% | +154.0% | +91.4% |
| All | +104.5% | -49.3% | +153.8% | +91.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling