+104.5%
FTNT vs ARMK
+47.4%
+57.1%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.9% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -5.8% | -2.4% | -3.4% | -5.8% |
| 30D | -4.8% | 0.0% | -4.8% | -4.8% |
| 3M | +4.4% | +6.7% | -2.2% | +3.9% |
| 6M | +88.8% | +38.8% | +50.0% | +82.7% |
| YTD | +96.8% | +55.2% | +41.6% | +87.9% |
| 1Y | +104.5% | +46.6% | +57.8% | +98.2% |
| All | +104.5% | +47.4% | +57.1% | +98.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling