-93.2%
FRMI vs LNT
+13.9%
-107.1%
-93.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -10.6% | +2.3% | -12.9% | -10.5% |
| 7D | -39.7% | +7.2% | -46.9% | -40.1% |
| 30D | -55.2% | +15.6% | -70.8% | -56.7% |
| 3M | -71.2% | +5.2% | -76.4% | -71.4% |
| 6M | -64.1% | +1.7% | -65.8% | -64.4% |
| YTD | -77.2% | +17.0% | -94.3% | -78.3% |
| 1Y | -93.2% | +14.2% | -107.4% | -93.5% |
| All | -93.2% | +13.9% | -107.1% | -93.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling