-63.2%
FLUT vs MTB
+27.0%
-90.1%
-68.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.3% | +1.2% | -3.5% | -3.0% |
| 7D | +4.2% | +2.0% | +2.1% | +2.9% |
| 30D | +8.0% | +2.9% | +5.1% | +6.2% |
| 3M | -22.1% | -10.7% | -11.4% | -17.2% |
| 6M | -21.7% | +6.3% | -28.0% | -26.1% |
| YTD | -62.0% | +13.8% | -75.8% | -65.5% |
| 1Y | -63.2% | +27.7% | -90.9% | -70.6% |
| All | -63.2% | +27.0% | -90.1% | -70.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling