-68.4%
FLNC vs NIO
-54.1%
-14.3%
-83.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +10.2% | +3.4% | +6.7% | +8.4% |
| 7D | -2.1% | -0.6% | -1.5% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -20.8% | -3.5% | -17.3% | -19.1% |
| 3M | -61.3% | -30.7% | -30.7% | -53.8% |
| 6M | -50.9% | -45.6% | -5.2% | -33.9% |
| YTD | -69.4% | -35.3% | -34.1% | -59.8% |
| 1Y | -68.4% | -53.9% | -14.5% | -48.3% |
| All | -68.4% | -54.1% | -14.3% | -48.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling