-68.4%
FLNC vs MTB
+27.0%
-95.4%
-83.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +10.2% | +1.2% | +9.0% | +10.2% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +2.0% | -4.1% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -20.8% | +2.9% | -23.7% | -20.8% |
| 3M | -61.3% | -10.7% | -50.7% | -61.7% |
| 6M | -50.9% | +6.3% | -57.2% | -50.8% |
| YTD | -69.4% | +13.8% | -83.1% | -72.0% |
| 1Y | -68.4% | +27.7% | -96.1% | -74.7% |
| All | -68.4% | +27.0% | -95.4% | -74.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling