+53.3%
FLNC vs EOSE
-49.1%
+102.4%
-68.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | +10.9% | -9.4% | -4.3% |
| 7D | -4.9% | +19.0% | -23.9% | -14.7% |
| 30D | -27.3% | +1.6% | -28.8% | -29.4% |
| 3M | -61.9% | -52.0% | -9.9% | -44.9% |
| 6M | -34.5% | -42.5% | +8.0% | -14.5% |
| YTD | -47.7% | -66.1% | +18.5% | -18.0% |
| 1Y | +53.3% | -47.1% | +100.5% | +77.5% |
| All | +53.3% | -49.1% | +102.4% | +77.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling