+53.3%
FLNC vs EAT
+37.5%
+15.9%
-68.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | +0.6% | +0.9% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -4.9% | 0.0% | -4.9% | -4.9% |
| 30D | -27.3% | +1.9% | -29.1% | -27.2% |
| 3M | -61.9% | +68.7% | -130.5% | -61.5% |
| 6M | -34.5% | +66.9% | -101.4% | -33.9% |
| YTD | -47.7% | +60.4% | -108.1% | -46.5% |
| 1Y | +53.3% | +44.0% | +9.3% | +74.6% |
| All | +53.3% | +37.5% | +15.9% | +74.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling