-68.4%
FLNC vs BIIB
+68.6%
-137.0%
-83.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +10.2% | +2.2% | +8.0% | +10.4% |
| 7D | -2.1% | +4.3% | -6.4% | -1.7% |
| 30D | -20.8% | +13.8% | -34.6% | -19.7% |
| 3M | -61.3% | +22.1% | -83.4% | -60.5% |
| 6M | -50.9% | +35.9% | -86.8% | -49.0% |
| YTD | -69.4% | +44.6% | -114.0% | -67.1% |
| 1Y | -68.4% | +70.4% | -138.8% | -66.1% |
| All | -68.4% | +68.6% | -137.0% | -66.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling