+53.3%
FLNC vs ABCL
+186.8%
-133.5%
-68.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.5% | -1.2% | +2.7% | +2.0% |
| 7D | -4.9% | +0.7% | -5.6% | -5.2% |
| 30D | -27.3% | +93.1% | -120.3% | -50.5% |
| 3M | -61.9% | +79.4% | -141.3% | -73.7% |
| 6M | -34.5% | +214.9% | -249.4% | -68.7% |
| YTD | -47.7% | +234.2% | -281.9% | -76.9% |
| 1Y | +53.3% | +174.8% | -121.4% | -13.0% |
| All | +53.3% | +186.8% | -133.5% | -13.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling