-51.7%
FIG vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+48.2%
-63.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.2% | -3.0% | +8.2% | +5.2% |
| 7D | -4.7% | -13.3% | +8.7% | -4.8% |
| 30D | +0.5% | -49.6% | +50.2% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -18.4% | -54.6% | +36.2% | -19.0% |
| 6M | +10.9% | -99.8% | +110.6% | +2.7% |
| YTD | -40.8% | -99.9% | +59.1% | -44.7% |
| 1Y | -51.7% | -99.9% | +48.2% | -52.9% |
| All | -51.7% | -99.9% | +48.2% | -52.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling