-55.8%
FIG vs XLC
0.0%
-55.8%
-76.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.4% | -1.2% | -3.2% | -2.6% |
| 7D | -16.3% | -0.8% | -15.5% | -15.2% |
| 30D | -14.3% | +1.0% | -15.4% | -16.0% |
| 3M | +7.2% | -0.7% | +7.8% | +7.0% |
| 6M | -18.6% | -5.1% | -13.5% | -11.4% |
| YTD | -35.5% | -4.3% | -31.2% | -30.5% |
| 1Y | -55.8% | -0.6% | -55.2% | -56.1% |
| All | -55.8% | 0.0% | -55.8% | -56.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling