-2.3%
FERG vs GLDM
+24.7%
-27.0%
-18.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.3% | -0.9% | +3.2% | +2.5% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -0.5% | +0.5% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -10.2% | +4.4% | -14.6% | -11.1% |
| 3M | -0.6% | -1.1% | +0.5% | -0.3% |
| 6M | -6.5% | -13.7% | +7.1% | -4.0% |
| YTD | +4.2% | +2.8% | +1.4% | +4.2% |
| 1Y | -2.3% | +24.8% | -27.1% | -15.5% |
| All | -2.3% | +24.7% | -27.0% | -15.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling