+60.3%
FCX vs MTZ
-14.7%
+75.0%
-24.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | -15.4% | +16.7% | +6.3% |
| 7D | -6.0% | -7.4% | +1.4% | -4.7% |
| 30D | -13.6% | -23.6% | +10.0% | -6.2% |
| 3M | -6.8% | -38.3% | +31.5% | +8.7% |
| 6M | +13.2% | -60.6% | +73.8% | +58.1% |
| YTD | +24.4% | -22.9% | +47.3% | +17.8% |
| 1Y | +60.3% | -14.3% | +74.6% | +39.0% |
| All | +60.3% | -14.7% | +75.0% | +39.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling