+281.4%
FCEL vs UMAC
+164.0%
+117.4%
-60.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | -3.1% | +5.0% | +3.1% |
| 7D | -15.8% | -0.9% | -14.9% | -15.9% |
| 30D | -29.3% | -7.7% | -21.6% | -28.1% |
| 3M | -30.1% | -26.4% | -3.7% | -24.1% |
| 6M | +74.4% | +61.9% | +12.6% | +31.2% |
| YTD | +104.5% | +86.5% | +18.0% | +40.7% |
| 1Y | +281.4% | +156.3% | +125.1% | +194.0% |
| All | +281.4% | +164.0% | +117.4% | +194.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling