+42.9%
FANG vs SCHG
+16.6%
+26.3%
-19.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | -0.9% | -1.0% | -2.2% |
| 7D | +0.8% | -0.7% | +1.5% | +0.5% |
| 30D | +7.6% | +0.2% | +7.4% | +7.7% |
| 3M | -1.3% | +2.2% | -3.5% | 0.0% |
| 6M | +14.7% | +15.0% | -0.4% | +21.3% |
| YTD | +34.8% | +9.2% | +25.6% | +41.7% |
| 1Y | +42.9% | +15.7% | +27.2% | +64.4% |
| All | +42.9% | +16.6% | +26.3% | +64.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling