+42.9%
FANG vs LCID
-71.9%
+114.8%
-19.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +1.7% | -3.6% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +0.8% | -6.6% | +7.4% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +7.6% | -30.1% | +37.7% | +7.4% |
| 3M | -1.3% | -17.6% | +16.3% | -1.4% |
| 6M | +14.7% | -54.4% | +69.1% | +17.4% |
| YTD | +34.8% | -55.7% | +90.5% | +37.7% |
| 1Y | +42.9% | -71.0% | +114.0% | +56.7% |
| All | +42.9% | -71.9% | +114.8% | +56.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling