+42.9%
FANG vs GTLB
+14.4%
+28.5%
-19.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +1.1% | -2.9% | -1.8% |
| 7D | +0.8% | +11.1% | -10.3% | +1.1% |
| 30D | +7.6% | +37.8% | -30.2% | +8.7% |
| 3M | -1.3% | +61.6% | -62.9% | +0.4% |
| 6M | +14.7% | +98.9% | -84.3% | +16.8% |
| YTD | +34.8% | +32.8% | +2.0% | +35.6% |
| 1Y | +42.9% | +14.7% | +28.3% | +47.3% |
| All | +42.9% | +14.4% | +28.5% | +47.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling