+42.9%
FANG vs EOSE
-49.1%
+92.0%
-19.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EOSE | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.8% | +10.9% | -12.7% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +0.8% | +19.0% | -18.2% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +7.6% | +1.6% | +6.0% | +7.8% |
| 3M | -1.3% | -52.0% | +50.7% | -2.0% |
| 6M | +14.7% | -42.5% | +57.2% | +14.7% |
| YTD | +34.8% | -66.1% | +100.9% | +34.8% |
| 1Y | +42.9% | -47.1% | +90.1% | +55.4% |
| All | +42.9% | -49.1% | +92.0% | +55.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EOSE.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EOSE return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EOSE return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EOSE wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling