+97.9%
EWT vs UMC
+209.4%
-111.6%
-19.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.9% | +4.6% | -2.7% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +4.0% | +5.0% | -1.0% | +2.5% |
| 30D | +10.3% | +7.7% | +2.6% | +7.9% |
| 3M | +6.1% | +1.7% | +4.4% | +4.7% |
| 6M | +56.6% | +113.9% | -57.3% | +31.7% |
| YTD | +76.6% | +168.9% | -92.3% | +40.2% |
| 1Y | +97.9% | +207.2% | -109.3% | +54.1% |
| All | +97.9% | +209.4% | -111.6% | +54.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling