-4.9%
EQT vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+95.0%
-28.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -3.0% | -0.2% | -3.1% |
| 7D | -6.6% | -13.3% | +6.8% | -6.3% |
| 30D | +2.7% | -49.6% | +52.4% | +4.1% |
| 3M | -0.2% | -54.6% | +54.5% | +1.1% |
| 6M | -10.6% | -99.8% | +89.2% | -6.7% |
| YTD | -1.2% | -99.9% | +98.7% | +4.1% |
| 1Y | -4.9% | -99.9% | +95.1% | +4.4% |
| All | -4.9% | -99.9% | +95.0% | +4.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling