+65.7%
ENTG vs LII
-26.0%
+91.8%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LII | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.5% | +3.6% | -10.1% | -8.4% |
| 7D | -10.3% | +7.9% | -18.2% | -14.3% |
| 30D | -14.4% | -0.6% | -13.7% | -15.8% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -19.3% | +18.2% | +12.8% |
| 6M | +3.0% | -29.8% | +32.8% | +27.6% |
| YTD | +70.1% | -25.4% | +95.5% | +92.6% |
| 1Y | +65.7% | -26.2% | +91.9% | +90.1% |
| All | +65.7% | -26.0% | +91.8% | +90.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LII.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LII return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LII return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LII wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling