+764.3%
ENTG vs ENB
+94.4%
+669.8%
-59.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10.
| Period | Portfolio | ENB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.9% | -3.8% | -0.1% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +5.1% | -4.6% | +9.7% | +7.6% |
| 30D | -8.5% | -5.2% | -3.3% | -6.2% |
| 3M | +6.7% | -13.4% | +20.1% | +13.8% |
| 6M | +17.7% | -7.8% | +25.5% | +20.9% |
| YTD | +63.5% | +4.9% | +58.6% | +56.0% |
| 1Y | +73.6% | +3.2% | +70.3% | +66.7% |
| 3Y | +44.6% | +71.0% | -26.4% | +3.0% |
| 5Y | +16.1% | +64.0% | -47.9% | -14.5% |
| All | +764.3% | +94.4% | +669.8% | +445.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling