-49.5%
ENPH vs PLTD
-76.7%
+27.2%
-64.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | +2.3% | -1.9% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +1.5% | +9.9% | -8.4% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -12.9% | +3.8% | -16.7% | -12.3% |
| 3M | -27.1% | -32.3% | +5.2% | -29.3% |
| 6M | -15.4% | -25.9% | +10.4% | -17.0% |
| YTD | +15.0% | -16.4% | +31.4% | +15.1% |
| 1Y | -0.7% | -25.2% | +24.5% | -1.7% |
| All | -49.5% | -76.7% | +27.2% | -58.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling