+34.2%
ECHO vs ZETA
+84.8%
-50.6%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.3% | +2.6% | -5.9% | -3.5% |
| 7D | +4.6% | -5.0% | +9.6% | +5.1% |
| 30D | +0.4% | -3.3% | +3.8% | +0.8% |
| 3M | +7.7% | +31.0% | -23.3% | +4.5% |
| 6M | -18.0% | +72.2% | -90.2% | -22.9% |
| YTD | -9.3% | +56.2% | -65.4% | -12.8% |
| 1Y | +34.2% | +90.3% | -56.1% | +28.4% |
| All | +34.2% | +84.8% | -50.6% | +28.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling