+33.6%
ECHO vs ZETA
+68.7%
-35.1%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -4.1% | +4.1% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +2.7% | +0.8% | +3.1% |
| 30D | +2.4% | +15.8% | -13.5% | +0.8% |
| 3M | -28.0% | +35.4% | -63.4% | -30.4% |
| 6M | -21.2% | +67.1% | -88.4% | -25.2% |
| YTD | -17.4% | +54.1% | -71.4% | -20.7% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | +67.8% | -34.2% | +30.6% |
| All | +33.6% | +68.7% | -35.1% | +30.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling