+33.6%
ECHO vs PLTD
-33.9%
+67.5%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +4.6% | -4.6% | +1.2% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +5.9% | -2.5% | +5.2% |
| 30D | +2.4% | -11.6% | +14.0% | -0.6% |
| 3M | -28.0% | -29.9% | +2.0% | -32.4% |
| 6M | -21.2% | -28.5% | +7.3% | -24.7% |
| YTD | -17.4% | -20.4% | +3.0% | -17.6% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | -33.3% | +66.9% | +26.8% |
| All | +33.6% | -33.9% | +67.5% | +26.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling