+33.6%
ECHO vs NXT
+26.2%
+7.4%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +1.2% | -1.2% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +3.4% | -1.1% | +4.5% | +3.6% |
| 30D | +2.4% | -15.3% | +17.7% | +5.3% |
| 3M | -28.0% | -43.8% | +15.8% | -22.2% |
| 6M | -21.2% | -18.7% | -2.6% | -17.4% |
| YTD | -17.4% | -3.0% | -14.4% | -14.1% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | +22.7% | +10.9% | +52.9% |
| All | +33.6% | +26.2% | +7.4% | +52.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling