+33.6%
ECHO vs MSTZ
-29.5%
+63.0%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +2.6% | -2.6% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +3.4% | -29.7% | +33.1% | +0.8% |
| 30D | +2.4% | -65.3% | +67.6% | -6.0% |
| 3M | -28.0% | -57.3% | +29.4% | -30.5% |
| 6M | -21.2% | -61.6% | +40.4% | -22.8% |
| YTD | -17.4% | -78.3% | +60.9% | -18.4% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | -30.2% | +63.8% | +47.1% |
| All | +33.6% | -29.5% | +63.0% | +47.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling