+33.6%
ECHO vs LULU
-49.9%
+83.5%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LULU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -17.4% | +17.4% | +2.7% |
| 7D | +3.4% | -16.7% | +20.1% | +6.0% |
| 30D | +2.4% | -18.5% | +20.9% | +5.2% |
| 3M | -28.0% | -19.5% | -8.5% | -25.7% |
| 6M | -21.2% | -41.9% | +20.7% | -14.3% |
| YTD | -17.4% | -51.6% | +34.2% | -7.6% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | -51.2% | +84.8% | +45.6% |
| All | +33.6% | -49.9% | +83.5% | +45.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LULU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LULU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LULU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LULU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling