+33.6%
ECHO vs AMC
-2.6%
+36.2%
-40.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | AMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +4.3% | -4.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +3.4% | +2.3% | +1.1% | +3.3% |
| 30D | +2.4% | -0.7% | +3.1% | +2.3% |
| 3M | -28.0% | +35.2% | -63.2% | -30.8% |
| 6M | -21.2% | +124.6% | -145.8% | -29.2% |
| YTD | -17.4% | +69.9% | -87.3% | -22.5% |
| 1Y | +33.6% | -2.6% | +36.2% | +35.3% |
| All | +33.6% | -2.6% | +36.2% | +35.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside AMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus AMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × AMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded AMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling