+55.2%
EBAY vs TRGP
+89.5%
-34.4%
-17.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.5% | -4.5% | +10.0% | +5.0% |
| 7D | +6.0% | -6.5% | +12.5% | +5.4% |
| 30D | +16.8% | -0.4% | +17.2% | +16.9% |
| 3M | +14.5% | +8.8% | +5.7% | +15.9% |
| 6M | +15.1% | +11.0% | +4.1% | +16.4% |
| YTD | +45.0% | +57.4% | -12.4% | +45.9% |
| 1Y | +55.2% | +87.9% | -32.7% | +54.1% |
| All | +55.2% | +89.5% | -34.4% | +54.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling