+55.2%
EBAY vs GLDM
+2.8%
+52.4%
-17.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.5% | +3.7% | +1.8% | +5.0% |
| 7D | +6.0% | -0.3% | +6.3% | +6.0% |
| 30D | +16.8% | -1.9% | +18.7% | +17.0% |
| 3M | +14.5% | -0.4% | +14.9% | +14.0% |
| 6M | +15.1% | -10.1% | +25.2% | +16.2% |
| YTD | +45.0% | -5.8% | +50.9% | +47.2% |
| 1Y | +55.2% | +3.1% | +52.1% | +44.6% |
| All | +55.2% | +2.8% | +52.4% | +44.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling