+250.2%
DOCN vs UMAC
+164.0%
+86.2%
-42.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.8% | -3.1% | +5.9% | +3.2% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -0.9% | +2.1% | +1.2% |
| 30D | -9.6% | -7.7% | -2.0% | -9.3% |
| 3M | -37.7% | -26.4% | -11.3% | -37.3% |
| 6M | +115.2% | +61.9% | +53.4% | +93.0% |
| YTD | +133.7% | +86.5% | +47.2% | +102.5% |
| 1Y | +250.2% | +156.3% | +93.8% | +201.6% |
| All | +250.2% | +164.0% | +86.2% | +201.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling