+111.1%
DINO vs LSCC
+72.9%
+38.2%
-17.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LSCC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +2.0% | -2.7% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +5.7% | +1.3% | +4.4% | +5.7% |
| 30D | +27.8% | -9.7% | +37.5% | +28.2% |
| 3M | +45.6% | -23.7% | +69.3% | +46.8% |
| 6M | +88.5% | +26.5% | +62.0% | +83.9% |
| YTD | +134.1% | +57.5% | +76.6% | +121.0% |
| 1Y | +111.1% | +75.7% | +35.4% | +95.8% |
| All | +111.1% | +72.9% | +38.2% | +95.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LSCC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LSCC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LSCC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LSCC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling