+143.3%
DELL vs ZTS
-26.9%
+170.3%
-36.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -8.8% | +7.5% | -16.3% | -6.9% |
| 7D | -24.6% | +15.4% | -40.0% | -21.8% |
| 30D | -32.5% | +25.8% | -58.2% | -29.3% |
| 3M | -20.2% | +18.1% | -38.3% | -16.8% |
| 6M | +76.5% | -19.7% | +96.2% | +101.1% |
| YTD | +198.9% | -27.5% | +226.4% | +260.4% |
| 1Y | +143.3% | -26.7% | +170.0% | +192.4% |
| All | +143.3% | -26.9% | +170.3% | +192.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling