+47.9%
DE vs UMAC
+164.0%
-116.1%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -3.1% | +2.9% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +10.0% | -0.9% | +10.9% | +10.0% |
| 30D | +13.3% | -7.7% | +21.0% | +13.3% |
| 3M | +17.5% | -26.4% | +43.9% | +18.0% |
| 6M | +13.6% | +61.9% | -48.3% | +10.8% |
| YTD | +49.8% | +86.5% | -36.7% | +45.1% |
| 1Y | +47.9% | +156.3% | -108.4% | +45.4% |
| All | +47.9% | +164.0% | -116.1% | +45.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling