+47.9%
DE vs RGEN
+45.2%
+2.7%
-19.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -1.2% | +1.1% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +10.0% | -4.9% | +14.9% | +10.4% |
| 30D | +13.3% | +5.7% | +7.6% | +12.7% |
| 3M | +17.5% | +32.4% | -14.9% | +14.7% |
| 6M | +13.6% | +33.2% | -19.6% | +10.1% |
| YTD | +49.8% | +2.3% | +47.5% | +47.4% |
| 1Y | +47.9% | +39.0% | +8.9% | +47.4% |
| All | +47.9% | +45.2% | +2.7% | +47.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling