-53.3%
CSGP vs GLDM
+2.8%
-56.1%
-61.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | +3.7% | +0.3% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +18.3% | -0.3% | +18.6% | +18.2% |
| 30D | +17.8% | -1.9% | +19.6% | +17.4% |
| 3M | +9.3% | -0.4% | +9.7% | +9.5% |
| 6M | -7.9% | -10.1% | +2.2% | -9.2% |
| YTD | -51.5% | -5.8% | -45.7% | -53.7% |
| 1Y | -53.3% | +3.1% | -56.4% | -57.3% |
| All | -53.3% | +2.8% | -56.1% | -57.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling