-65.3%
CSGP vs BBIO
+44.0%
-109.3%
-69.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | -0.8% | -1.7% | -2.5% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -2.3% | -1.8% | -4.2% |
| 30D | +2.3% | -8.7% | +11.0% | +1.9% |
| 3M | -8.2% | +11.2% | -19.3% | -7.8% |
| 6M | -35.1% | +12.5% | -47.5% | -34.5% |
| YTD | -54.0% | -2.2% | -51.9% | -53.7% |
| 1Y | -65.3% | +44.4% | -109.7% | -65.8% |
| All | -65.3% | +44.0% | -109.3% | -65.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling