+15.6%
CRCL vs NIO
+3.3%
+12.3%
-80.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1990-01-01 to 2026-09-08.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.8% | -0.3% | -5.5% | -5.7% |
| 7D | +7.5% | -6.7% | +14.1% | +9.1% |
| 30D | +44.3% | -20.0% | +64.3% | +51.3% |
| 3M | +16.5% | -30.5% | +47.0% | +25.9% |
| 6M | -5.6% | -20.7% | +15.1% | +1.1% |
| YTD | +21.3% | -25.7% | +47.0% | +30.3% |
| 1Y | -14.5% | -38.6% | +24.1% | -2.7% |
| All | +15.6% | +3.3% | +12.3% | +117.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1990-01-01 to 2026-09-08: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1990-01-01 to 2026-09-08 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling